Friday, May 05, 2006

Still not porn, after all these years

Remember way back when? All the way back when I invited search engines to list me as pornography?

Apparently it's working like gangbusters! Gangbusters, I say!

In addition to the two searches that inspired that post ("sharon stone's vagina" and "girls with balls and a hairy weiner") and the later "sex machine robot" hits, I got a fun one today.

"Robot Like Boobs"

And I'm the first result for this very common search!

As far as I know, there are two feasible meanings for "Robot Like Boobs"
  • Grammatically incorrect hunt for a robot that likes boobs. I'm not willing to give this one much credence, because, frankly, I am unwilling to believe that anybody's grammar is that atrocious. Except maybe cavemen. And not REAL cavemen, but those stereotypical cavemen that spoke in sentence fragments and didn't know how to properly conjugate their verbs. Real cavemen didn't suck that much, and they hit each other with dinosaur bones and little Martians spoke to them.
This leaves me with one other solution.
  • Somebody was looking for "robot-like boobs." This raises the question: what makes boobs particularly robot-like? I can understand if somebody was searching for "robot boobs"--boobs that actually are part of a robot or perform some sort of robotic function; but who is truly in the market for normal boobs that are just robot-like? Do they look like they are made of metal? Are they pointy? Do they attack you and shoot lasers?
This is a picture I found Google-searching for "Robot Like Boobs."

I think this case is closed. Thanks, Google.

(If you are the person who found this site while searching for "Robot Like Boobs," please reveal your intentions. I demand satisfaction.)

No comments: